Cases 51 - 60 of 2,028
Bernardo v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Thomas Bernardo
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 23-4028
Petitioner:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
KATHERINE LESTER, Sacramento Police Chief, K. SIMMONS, #693, P. FONG, #3015 and others
Jacoby v. Board of Supervisors of the University of Louisiana System
as 2:2023cv02848
Respondent:
Board of Supervisors of the University of Louisiana System
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jacoby
Carbin v. Cain
as 23-60618
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Carbin
Respondent / Appellee:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Tate County Board of Supervisors and George C. Carlson, Jr.
Risdal v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Kim Reynolds, Story County Iowa Board of Supervisors and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook #149256 v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
Seantain Cook
Defendant:
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa, County of, Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others
Jacoby v. Board of Supervisors of the University of Louisiana System
as 2:2023mc00403
Respondent:
Board of Supervisors of the University of Louisiana System
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jacoby
Lamar Cannady v. Matthew Schofield
as 23-7111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR CANNADY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW SCHOFIELD, Public Defender, in his individual and official capacity, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE-ADVOCATE OFFICE, County of Polk, in its official capacity, COUNTY OF POLK, State of North Carolina funded, in its official capacity and others
Pacific Pipeline Company et al v. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
as 2:2023cv09218
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Petitioner:
Pacific Pipeline Company
Respondent:
Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
