Cases 51 - 60 of 138
The Chudy Group LLC v. KLS Nederland BV
as 2:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
The Chudy Group LLC
Defendant:
KLS Nederland BV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mustill v. Spearman et al
as 3:2013cv01095
Plaintiff:
Sean Everett Mustill
Defendant:
Marion Spearman, Tony Wagner, R. Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 12-17838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, E. KLEIN, A. JANNAH and others
Gilberto Sanchez v. Joseph Chudy
as 12-17777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERTO SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., Chief Medical Officer (C.M.O.)
Chudy v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv30210
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
John Chudy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Chudy et al
as 1:2012cv08746
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Steven C. Chudy, Sherry A. Ligas-Chudy and Midland Credit Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Randy Geren v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY JAMES GEREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, J. WALKER, JOHN W. HAVILAND and others
Eric Collins v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
Eric Collins
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown, David Rohndanz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawalto Watts v. Dallas County Jail, et al
as 12-11745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWALTO WATTS
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLAS COUNTY JAIL, WILAMENA PHILLIPS, CHUDY OKOYE and others
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc v. Stuart Day, et al
as 12-8008
Respondent:
Stuart R. Day, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Robert Sweeten, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Deborah McElroy, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
