Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Watkins v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv04635
Plaintiff:
Kevin Watkins
Defendant:
Derek Smith , Adriane Eisen , Bryan S. Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cable v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cable
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Michael Tomek , Unknown Tomek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jack Hays v. John Baldwin, et al
as 11-3172
Plaintiff:
Chris Bennett, Derek Smith, Dale Viers and others
Movant - Appellant:
Jack L. Hays
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Director, John Ault, Warden, Deb Nichols, Associate Warden Security and others
Mitchell v. Belsterling et al
as 2:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tramane Lopez Mitchell
Defendant:
Phillip Belsterling, Derek Smith and Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Fred Barnett et al
as 2:2010cv06521
Defendant:
Chidi Ahantou, Gene Atkins, Obafemi Ayambadejo and others
Plaintiff:
Miami Dolphins, Ltd.
Allison et al v. CRC Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03313
Defendant:
CRC Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chona Allison , Arthur Baden , Stephen Beard and others
Counter_defendant:
Matt Anderson, Jessica Bakhos, Julienne Berniard and others
Cross_defendant:
Maureen Meneghetti and Ryan Scott
Counter_claimant:
CRC Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DG FastChannel, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00322
Plaintiff:
Derek Smith
Defendant:
DG FastChannel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2010hc60091
Plaintiff:
Derek Smith
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter International, Inc., Scientific Protein Laboratories, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
