Cases 51 - 60 of 85
William Fedail v. David Gonzales et al
as 5:2015cv00980
Defendant:
Does and David Gonzales
Plaintiff:
William Fedail
USA v. David Gonzale
as 15-40697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID GONZALES
Gonzales v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Ross Sanchez, Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office and Daniel Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Gomez v. Arturo Koenig, et al
as 14-56409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH J. GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTURO KOENIG, ZACHARY JORDAN, ISMAEL DAVID GONZALES and others
Prejean v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Defendant:
Charles A Daniels, David Gonzales, Jr, Rebecca Nicholas Mallet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Lockhart et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2007cv01680
Plaintiff:
Faustino Del Valle, Karen Mickle, Naomi Cabrera and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Lee Baca and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Petitioner:
Pierre B Nadeau
Interested Party:
Michael Ascolese and Bruce Vallerand
Intervenor:
ALADS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzales v. Stralla et al
as 3:2013cv00648
Defendant:
Chris Fortier, Douglas Hildebrand and Roy L. Stralla
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 6:2013cv00077
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales and Norma Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Pottawatomie County of, David Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
