Cases 51 - 60 of 296
Donald Walden, Jr., et al v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WALDEN, Jr., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Johnson v. Dicues et al
as 2:2017cv03045
Defendant:
Julio Calderon, James Cox, Dicues and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Dicus et al
as 2:2016cv02816
Defendant:
A. Dicus, James Dzurenda, High Desert State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dicus et al v. SSC Operating Company LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03337
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dicus, Sr. , Carle Dicus, Jr. and Roland Dicus
Defendant:
SSC Operating Company LLC and Maria Rosado, LPN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. R&P Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02133
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Defendant:
R&P Industrial Services, Inc., Henry L. Dicus, Cheryl M. Kripps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emanuel v. Dicus
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Emanuel, Jr.
Defendant:
Margaret Dicus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dicus v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Dicus
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv01788
Defendant:
Mr. Adams, Mr. Ali, Ms. Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Lionell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01672
Defendant:
Lieutenant Carlman, Director Gregory Cox, A. Dicus and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
