Cases 51 - 60 of 475
Jane Doe EB 18 v. Uber Technologies, Inc
as 3:2024cv05215
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe EB 18
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jane Doe EB 19 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2024cv05217
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe EB 19
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe (EB) v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05110
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (EB)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Emigrant Business Credit Corporation v. Hanratty et al
as 1:2024cv06111
Defendant:
RE 2EMI, LLC, Arque Tax Receivable Fund (Maryland), LLC, EB 1EMISC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Emigrant Business Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
LITTLE v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2024cv04033
Defendant:
EB ADYEMI, CHAPLINE KEN, DANIELLE OUTLAW and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bogle v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bogle
Defendant:
Seth Thibodeau, Brandon Norris, Phil Crary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bogle v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv01652
Defendant:
Sheriff Justin Oliver, Justin Ebbing, Roger Zimmerman and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
