Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Heatley v. Driver et al
as 5:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Andre L. Heatley
Respondent:
Joe Driver and Edward F. Reilly, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01419
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Byrd
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PUIFORY v. REILLY et al
as 3:2008cv00982
Plaintiff:
Reginald S. Puifory
Defendant:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Deborah A. Spagnoli and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AUSTIN v. REILLY
as 1:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
ROMES AUSTIN
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gerald Rogers v. Mary Schapiro
as 08-5069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gerald L. Rogers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harvey L. Pitt, Securities and Exchange Commission, Christopher Cox, Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00337
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cordero v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv00390
Petitioner:
Luis Cordero
Respondent:
Jerry C. Martinez, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Michael J. Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRYANT v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00315
Plaintiff:
RICKY BRYANT
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. REILLY et al
as 1:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CROSBY BEY
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., DEVON BROWN and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 7:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
