Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Maureene Stanley v. The Huntington National Bank
as 12-1145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAUREENE E. STANLEY, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles F. Stanley, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, a banking corporation
Perez v. Stanley et al
as 5:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jason Kerry Perez
Defendant:
Reginaldo F Stanley, Dawn Grounds and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trivitt v. Stanley et al
as 5:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Charlie Dean Trivitt
Defendant:
Reginaldo F Stanley and Tanya Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43735
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL F STANLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Stanley v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00061
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Mitzi F Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gonzales et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 4:2010cv00752
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzales and Lisa Gonzales
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's and Steve F. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stanley v. Wong et al
as 4:2009cv04580
Plaintiff:
Jerry F Stanley
Defendant:
Wong, Dacanay, J Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Wong et al
as 2:2009cv02546
Plaintiff:
Jerry F Stanley
Defendant:
Wong, Dacanay, J Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Wong et al
as 2:2009cv02450
Plaintiff:
Jerry F Stanley, -
Defendant:
Wong, Oacanay, J Arnoio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin, Jr. v. Zavaras, et al
as 09-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Mr., Executive Director, JOE ORTIZ, Mr. Director of Correction, et al., JAMES ABBOTT, Mr., Warden of C.T.C.F. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
