Cases 51 - 60 of 398
Maceo J. Hill v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01877
Plaintiff:
MACEO J. HILL
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2021cv01429
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, J HILL and SEVERAL UNKNOWN NAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06082
Plaintiff:
Andrea N. Wright, Barbara Fields, Bernard Coates and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason v. Robinson et al
as 7:2021cv00320
Defendant:
Claim #6 Participants, Abstraction Team, Stallard and others
Plaintiff:
Hubert Alan Jason, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Annucci
as 6:2021cv06373
Petitioner:
Michael J. Hill
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Saul
as 7:2021cv00271
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Danbury Hardware Hank and Building Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Marshall G. Hill, Danbury Hardware Hank and Building Supply, Inc. and Judy J. Hill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hail et al v. Scott et al
as 6:2021cv00378
Defendant:
Jamie Alvarez, MD., B. E. Uebele, IV, A. Moody and others
Plaintiff:
C. Hail Debond, P. K. Hail Smith, Jayson Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. Griffin, et al
as 21-1399
Defendant / Appellee:
B. Kelly, Mailroom, Pulaski County Jail, R. Funk, Financial Office, Pulaski County Jail, BilBruck, Sergeant, Pulaski County Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01611
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE J HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
