Cases 51 - 60 of 97
Estate of Doris Holt v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 14-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORIS HOLT, Estate of, RODNEY KEITH LAIL and IRENE SANTACROCE
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPENCER, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, RICKY STEPHENS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, HORRY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES ALBERT ALLEN, JR. and others
James Spencer v. Horry County, South Carolina
as 14-1666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SPENCER
Plaintiff:
RODNEY KEITH LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, SOUTHERN HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STEVEN HARTNESS, HAROLD STEVEN HARTNESS, ANCIL B. GARVIN, III and others
:
, and
Spencer et al v. AJP Crestliner, LLC et al
as 9:2014cv80603
Plaintiff:
James Spencer and Marcia Spencer
Defendant:
AJP Crestliner, LLC and Zibgniew Bozcek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Spencer v. Warden Allenwood USP, et al
as 13-4487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Spencer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26154
Plaintiff:
Mey Spencer and James Spencer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. Zickefoose et al
as 3:2013cv01120
Petitioner:
James Spencer
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neil Lieser v. James Spencer
as 13-6010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEIL JAMES LIESER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SPENCER, N.R.J.A., DAVID SIMMONS, C.C.O., SHAR MASON, D.I.S. and others
Wade v. Spencer et al
as 2:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Warren T. Wade
Defendant:
James Spencer, J. Winslow and M. Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
