Cases 51 - 60 of 907
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Burnette v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Burnette
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Falvey v. Freese et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Falvey
Defendant:
Marty Freese, Faith Ellen Supp, Atore Norevasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falvey v. Bush et al
as 3:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Falvey
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Rumfsfield, Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falvey v. Stevens et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Falvey
Defendant:
Deputy Stevens, Undersheriff Supp, Sgt of Dispach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falvey v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Defendant:
John Thomas Falvey, Joe Biden, DOJ FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falvey v. Obama et al
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Falvey
Defendant:
Barack Haain Obama, Joe Biden, Jeana Haskel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falvey v. Elko Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Falvey
Defendant:
Elko Sheriff Dept, Tyler Ingraham, City of Wells NV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv16695
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) et al
as 3:2023cv16702
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
