Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Barnett v. Curtis
as 5:2016ct03056
Plaintiff: James Anthony Barnett, Jr.
Defendant: Clifford Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Bowman
as 5:2016ct03037
Plaintiff: James Anthony Barnett, Jr.
Defendant: Dr. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff: JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant: ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and BRIAN S. COPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Collins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv00301
Plaintiff: James Joseph Barnett
Defendant: Tony Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. PAGE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01064
Plaintiff: JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant: SAMUEL PAGE and JENNY THOMAS, RN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. ALAMANCE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE DETENTION CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00732
Plaintiff: JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant: ALAMANCE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE DETENTION CENTER, JANICE TILLEY, SUSAN FONTIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Beckstrom
as 5:2014cv00311
Petitioner: James H. Barnett
Respondent: Gary Beckstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Barnett v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10526
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES HENRY BARNETT
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: James Barnett
as 13-10392
Movant: In re: JAMES HENRY BARNETT
Barnett v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00978
Petitioner: James Henry Barnett
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?