Cases 51 - 60 of 815
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14520
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Citiri, Inc. v. Axis Orat, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00798
Plaintiff:
Citiri, Inc.
Defendant:
Axis Orat, LLC and James Collin Browning
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11823
Plaintiff:
JAMES CODY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manisha Penesa v. Shawn Brown, et al
as 22-55591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANISHA L. PENESA
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN BROWN, Peace-Officer, in individual capacity and REBECCA REYES, individual and official capacity
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, JAMES A. BROWN III, in individual capacity, K. HUGHES, Warden, in individual and official capacity and others
BROWN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
James Jamal Brown
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sergeant Michael Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McIntyre et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2018cv02545
Defendant:
Estate of James Michael Krstolich, Dennis Ware, W. K. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntyre, et al v. Golubski, et al
as 22-3115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAMONTE MCINTYRE and ROSE LEE MCINTYRE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER GOLUBSKI, Detective
Defendant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, DENNIS WARE, Detective, JAMES L. BROWN, officer and others
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09031
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
