Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Robinson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Corey Jawan Robinson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, S Mosher, W Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Blackwell v. Warden
as 1:2009cv02383
Plaintiff:
James Blackwell
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tooke v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2009cv01431
Plaintiff:
Kyle Tooke
Defendant:
John Ozmint, McKither Bodison, Aaron Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lamb v. Blackwell
as 8:2009cv01269
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamb
Defendant:
James Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thurman Lilly v. Fred Thompson
as 09-6723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THURMAN VAN LILLY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED THOMPSON, Associate Warden, MORRIS ELMORE, Lieutenant EHSO, JAMES BLACKWELL, DHO and others
Patrick et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
Dennis Patrick, Dennis Patrick, James Blackwell and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Woods v. City of Salina, Kansas et al
as 6:2008cv01370
Plaintiff:
Anthony Firm Woods and Anthony Firm Woods
Defendant:
City of Salina, Kansas, Randy Jennings, Rico Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patrick et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv05026
Plaintiff:
Dennis Patrick, Dennis Patrick, James Blackwell and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Blackwell v. Westinghouse Electric Corporatio, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-82230
Plaintiff:
James Blackwell
Defendant:
Westinghouse Electric Corporatio
James Blackwell v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84633
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
James Blackwell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
