Cases 51 - 60 of 157
REAVIS v. HICKS et al
as 1:2019cv21711
Defendant:
DR. SANTANGELLO, VICTORIA D'AMICO, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
CARL L. REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. POWELL et al
as 1:2019cv19252
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR JOHN POWELL
Petitioner:
ERIC HINES
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SKELTON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv18597
Defendant:
DOES 1-200, MARCUS O. HICKS, DOES 501-600 and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SKELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKELTON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv18597
Defendant:
DOES 1-200, MARCUS O. HICKS, DOES 501-600 and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SKELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINOR v. DILKS et al
as 1:2019cv18261
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN KHULEN, SGT. DAVID DILKS, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS MINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. POWELL et al
as 3:2019cv18232
Petitioner:
GARY ABDQ HARRIS
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN POWELL, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HESTER v. POWELL
as 2:2019cv17820
Petitioner:
JOEL HESTER
Respondent:
JOHN POWELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zabloudil v. City of Davenport, Legal Department, et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Defendant:
John Powell, City of Davenport, Legal Department and City of Davenport
Plaintiff:
Teresa Zabloudil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDLEY et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03263
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SCHRODT, EDWARD BRUNETTI, JEFFREY KILCREASE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
