Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Rucker et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00856
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rucker , Frank Roberts , Richard Tabler and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney Romeo Motors, Inc. v. Russo et al
as 1:2016cv01038
Plaintiff:
McKinney Romeo Motors, Inc.
Defendant:
John Russo, Tactical Technologies Inc. and Tactical Computer Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stacher v. Russo et al
as 3:2016cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kristofer W. Stacher
Defendant:
John Russo, Christopher Carter, Gordan Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Russo
as 1:2015cv06215
Plaintiff:
Leslie E. Brown
Defendant:
City of New York and Det. John Russo
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Russo
as 3:2015cv03097
Plaintiff:
Morris Dean Davis
Defendant:
John Russo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Orlando et al
as 1:2015cv01429
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Knox
Defendant:
Kathleen Orlando, John Russo, Joseph Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mytsak v. Baltimore County Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv01324
Plaintiff:
Vasyl Mytsak
Defendant:
Baltimore County Maryland , Vincent J Gardina , John Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2014cv09602
Plaintiff:
Vandyke Johnson
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Mark Fishstein, John Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. Russo Battista, P.L. et al
as 0:2014cv60613
Plaintiff:
Mayra Santana Munoz
Defendant:
Russo Battista, P.L. , Anthony J. Russo, Jr., P.A. , Anthony John Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
