Cases 51 - 60 of 159
Davis v. City of Hudson Oaks et al
as 4:2019cv00503
Defendant:
John Doe, City of Hudson Oaks and Joni May
Plaintiff:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis, Jr. v. County of Dallas et al
as 4:2019cv00398
Defendant:
Michelle E. Heron, Darlene Ewing, Renie McClellan and others
Plaintiff:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr. and Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00883
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGUILAR v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS, FRANK JAMES, KENNETH DAVIS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Bezingue et al v. Steuben Lakes Regional Waste District
as 1:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Freds, Darrell Robbins, Kenneth Davis and others
Defendant:
Steuben Lakes Regional Waste District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00468
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Frank James, Kenneth Davis and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vetter et al v. Marriott International, Inc.,
as 8:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chambers, Richard Ryans, Brad Barringer and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
White v. Gee et al
as 8:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Col. Donna Lusczynski, Maj. Robert Ura, Col. Kenneth Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Magan White
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
