Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Kamsult Inc v. Kama Sutra Closet LLC et al
as 2:2013cv07403
Defendant:
Does, Roylin Downs and Kama Sutra Closet LLC
Plaintiff:
Kamsult Inc
Gil Hermosillo, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
as 13-80191
Plaintiff - Respondent:
GIL HERMOSILLO, ELAINE JACKSON, PATRICK KENNEDY and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Hermosillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03169
Plaintiff:
Gil Hermosillo , Elaine Jackson , Patrick Kennedy and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Hermosillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03169
Plaintiff:
Gil Hermosillo , Elaine Jackson , Patrick Kennedy and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv01404
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Campbell Company LLC v. Heirs or Assigns of Aaiki et al
as 1:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
James Campbell Company LLC
Defendant:
Heirs or Assigns of Aaiki, Heirs or Assigns of Kipi, Heirs or Assigns of Niau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Woodward v. Tillinghast et al
as 1:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodward
Defendant:
Tillinghast, Dalia, Furney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paolucci v. Render, Kamas Law Firm
as 12-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara Paolucci
Defendant - Appellee:
Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
Kama v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp23198
Plaintiff:
Harry Kama
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paolucci v. Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
as 6:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
Barbara Paolucci
Defendant:
Render Kamas Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
