Cases 51 - 60 of 209
Davie v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv01700
Plaintiff:
Keith Davie
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02905
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON POST NEWS PAPER, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEDERAL CIRCUIT, ATTORNEY DAVID BARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
KIETH DAVIS and KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04080
Defendant:
Thomas, Garcia, Gubala and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv22263
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04079
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stross v. Davis Real Estate Development LLC et al
as 1:2019cv22646
Defendant:
Hager Keith Davis and Davis Real Estate Development LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
DAVIS v. R A W CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 4:2019cv00165
Defendant:
R.A.W. CONSTRUCTION LLC and R A W CONSTRUCTION LLC
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baum et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv01018
Plaintiff:
John Kalfayan, Terrence M. O'Neill, Lawrence Krupinski and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC and Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Russell et al
as 3:2018cv01205
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Lieutenant Holland
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN et al
as 2:2018cv03033
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN, JUDGE NAZARIO JIMINEZ, THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT AND ITS APPEALS COURT and others
Petitioner:
KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
