Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Pugh et al v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2016cv14766
Plaintiff:
Ernest Pugh, III and Linda Davis Pugh
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2016cv06696
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Williams and B.M.W.
Defendant:
Tom Wilson , Hubert Stalling , Todd Renihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilcox et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00753
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Plaintiff:
Wilcox, Robert Wilcox, David Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00069
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVIS, LINDA DAVIS and PAUL DUNTON
Petitioner:
CITY OF BANGOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Davis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Jason Davis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN BARTON HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13898
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis and Roger Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis-Bill v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv03585
Plaintiff:
Linda Davis-Bill
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
