Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 591
LEIGHTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20224
Plaintiff: ALVARO LEIGHTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leighton v. Bartomeo Realty Inc.
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff: Richard E. Leighton, Jr.
Defendant: Bartomeo Realty Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Leighton v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00394
Plaintiff: Susan A. Leighton
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Curtis v. United States Of America
as 0:2022cv61528
Plaintiff: Leighton Martin Curtis
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Leighton v. Hearst Communications, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04889
Plaintiff: Richard Leighton and Richard Leighton, Jr.
Defendant: Hearst Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hargiss v. LaSalle Corrections L L C et al
as 3:2018cv01466
Not Classified By Court: LaSalle Corrections, ET AL
Plaintiff: Brian Patrick Hargiss
Defendant: Roger Colvin, Robert Colvin, LaSalle Corrections L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leighton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02180
Plaintiff: Cecil Leighton
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Kim McBride
as 22-1538
Petitioner: In re: KIM LEIGHTON MCBRIDE
Matthew Borke v. Kelcy Warren, et al
as 22-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW SHAWN BORKE
Defendant: KELCY WARREN, Executive Chairman and Board Chairman Energy Transfer, KEVIN JAMES MAYBERRY, Chief Executive Officer, Leighton Security, GARY WASHBURN, Operations Manager, Leighton Security and others
Cross Appellant: ENERGY TRANSFER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?