Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Palmer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Michael Palmer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEALTHPLANCRM, LLC v. PRICE et al
as 2:2016cv01835
Plaintiff:
HEALTHPLANCRM, LLC
Defendant:
DARYL LINN PRICE , PAUL JOSEPH LEFFLER , MICHAEL PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HealthPlanCRM, LLC v. Price et al
as 1:2016cv02184
Plaintiff:
HealthPlanCRM, LLC
Defendant:
Daryl Linn Price , Paul Joseph Leffler , Michael Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthew Akins v. Daniel Knight, et al
as 16-3555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew Stephen Akins
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel K. Knight, Steven Ray Berry, Brent Nelson and others
Perez, U. S. Secretary of Labor v. Eustis Cable Enterprises, Ltd. et al
as 4:2016cv01639
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez, U. S. Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
Eustis Cable Enterprises, Ltd. and Michael Palmer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Akins v. Knight et al
as 2:2015cv04096
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stephen Akins
Defendant:
Daniel K Knight, Steven Ray Berry, Brent Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed et al v. Olmsted Medical Center et al
as 0:2015cv01915
Plaintiff:
Khadija Ahmed and Mohamud Ali
Defendant:
Olmsted Medical Center , Kenneth Michael Palmer and Patricia Alina Agudelo Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIX v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
JOHN DIX
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , MICHAEL PALMER , BRANDON BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Michael Palmer
as 15-3006
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Palmer, also known as Tony, also known as Knot, also known as James
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
