Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Miller v. PC- Wireless, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dashaya Miller
Defendant:
PC- Wireless, Inc. and Paul Clark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Valmain v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Paul Clark Valmain
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: PA Child Care, LLC, et al
as 12-4452
Petitioner:
In re: PA CHILD CARE LLC, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CHILD CARE, LLC and MID ATLANTIC YOUTH SERVICES CORPORATION
Respondent:
FLORENCE WILLIAM, et al., SAMANTHA HUMANIK, CINDY LEHAN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
WILLIAM CONWAY, et al.
Nominal Respondent:
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
Paul Clark v. Bank of America National Association et al
as 2:2012cv07797
Defendant:
Aames Home Loans, BAC Home Loan Servicing LP, Bank of America National Association and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Clark
Paul Clark v. Brian T Moynihan et al
as 2:2012cv02751
Defendant:
Bank of America, David C Darnell, Charles O Holiday, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Clark
Paul Clarke v. Steve Rader
as 12-30252
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL CLARKE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, Warden
Paul Clark v. Martin R. Santos et al
as 2:2011cv04970
Plaintiff:
Paul Clark
Defendant:
Martin Santos, Jr and Martin R. Santos
CLARK et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61637
Plaintiff:
PAUL CLARK and RUTH CLARK
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Basile et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03847
Plaintiff:
Christopher Basile , George Paul Clarke , Keith Duncan and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
