Cases 51 - 60 of 89
Hard v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2014cv03639
Plaintiff:
Charles Hard
Defendant:
City of Berwyn , Casey Stefano , Joseph Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Rynearson v. USA, et al
as 13-51114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD RYNEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGENT LANDS, Border Patrol Agent, Individually and RAUL PEREZ, Border Partrol Agent, Individually
Chavez et al v. DV Services LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01328
Defendant:
DV Services LLC , Darrell Brown and Michael Withrow
Plaintiff:
Jorge Chavez , Raul Perez and Julio Vargas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00597
Petitioner:
Raul Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adams et al v. Brock Services, Ltd.
as 1:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Matthew Adams , All Plaintiffs , Rios Manuel Alaniz and others
Defendant:
Brock Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Raul Napoles-Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71085
Petitioner:
RAUL NAPOLES-PEREZ, AKA Raul Perez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Perez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2013cv00097
Petitioner:
Raul Perez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Vallejo, Jr. (Vallejo, Sr)
as 13-468
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gaspar Vallejo, Jr., John Vallejo, Jose Ramos and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gaspar Vallejo, Sr., AKA Omar
Rynearson v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Defendant:
Agent Lands, Raul Perez and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Richard Rynearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
