Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Alex Howard v. Robert Eason, et al
as 15-10082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX JARAUN HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EASON, MICHAEL UPSHAW, PAUL MORALES and others
New England Phoenix Company, Inc. v. Webb
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
New England Phoenix Company, Inc.
Defendant:
James S. Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zollicoffer v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03037
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Zollicoffer
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Ralph Bales, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Eason et al
as 7:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Robert Eason, Michael Upshaw, Paul Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nedro Parker, et al v. TDCJ, et al
as 14-10190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDRO GWEN PARKER and FREDERICK DEONE GOODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCIENCE CENTER/CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE CONTRACT (COMMITTEE), RICHARD E. WATHEN, In his official capacity and under color of office and others
Webb v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31047
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Webb
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2013cv02006
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Angella S. Webb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Webb v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2013at01115
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Angella S. Webb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gooden v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2013cv03154
Defendant:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID, Haywood Talib, Chaplain Hartwell and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Deone Gooden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
