Cases 51 - 60 of 117
Shumpert v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2017cv00352
Defendant:
Bell County District Attorney's Office, Attorney Zachary L. Boyd, Paul Lapak and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lamont Shumpert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peggy Shumpert, et al v. City of Tupelo, Mississippi, et al
as 17-60774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEGGY SHUMPERT, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Antwun Shumpert, Sr., and on behalf of the heirs and wrongful death beneficiaries of Antwun "Ronnie" Shumpert, Sr., Deceased, CHARLES FOSTER and ESTATE OF ANTWUN SHUMPERT, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI and OFFICER TYLER COOK, in his individual and official capacities
Donald Shumpert v. Thomas Winn
as 17-1585
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD SHUMPERT
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS WINN, Warden
United States v. Reginald Shumpert
as 17-1168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Reginald L. Shumpert
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s):
The Innocence Project, Inc.
Reginald Shumpert v. Eddy Lange
as 16-51390
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD LAMONT SHUMPERT
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDY LANGE
Shumpert v. Karol et al
as 1:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Shumpert
Defendant:
P. Karol and Unknown Elms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shumpert v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Donnie Wayne Shumpert
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shumpert et al v. City of Tupelo, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Peggy Shumpert and Charles Foster
Defendant:
City of Tupelo, Mississippi , Jason Shelton , Bart Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Shumpert v. Eddy Lange
as 16-50711
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD LAMONT SHUMPERT
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDY LANGE
Reginald Shumpert v. John Gaunt, et al
as 16-50632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD LAMONT SHUMPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN GAUNT, LESLIE MCWILLIAMS and EDDY LANGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
