Cases 51 - 60 of 541
Singleton v. West Memphis Police Department
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Elijah Jartavius Singleton, Sr
Defendant:
West Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Razulu v. Seamster et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shaka Rushdee Razulu
Defendant:
Lonnell Oquin Seamster, Sr, Tina M Evans, Brenda L Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pulaski County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dana Lamon Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Does
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
Does Unknown BOP Medical Staff, FCI Forrest City, AR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
K Cauley, Hall, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, B Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Dansby v. Otwell et al
as 4:2022cv04112
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Defendant:
Steve Otwell, Karen Ghormley, Calee Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. Otwell et al
as 4:2022cv01111
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Defendant:
Steve Otwell, Karen Ghormley, Calee Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
