Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Nelson v. Cain
as 2:2013cv04998
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Nelson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castaneda-Arroyo et al v. Summitt Forests, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Oscar Castaneda-Arroyo, Carlos Eduardo Flores-Castaneda, Julio Cesar Reyes-Falcon and others
Defendant:
Gorgonio Ibarra-Munoz, Ismael Ibarra-Munoz, Vicente Ibarra-Muoz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2012cv00734
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Nelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NELSON v. USA
as 1:2012cv01455
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GREGORY SCOTT NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzales v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
Matt Wilson and Scott Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gegare et al v. Hoffa et al
as 1:2011cv03980
Plaintiff:
Fred Gegare , Steve LLoyd , Tim Dubois and others
Defendant:
James Phillip Hoffa and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Stanley Constantino, et al v. Michigan Department of State P, et al
as 11-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY CONSTANTINO, GAIL JONES, RICHARD KONKEL and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTIE K. ETUE, Col., Michigan State Police Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
