Cases 51 - 60 of 826
Antonello Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Asso, et al
as 19-2515
Defendant / Appellee:
CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, PROF 2013 S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST II, DONALD KRESESKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00880
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002 v. Doody III et al
as 3:2019cv01190
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., James J. Doody III, Seterus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J DOODY III TRUSTEE OF THE MARY Y, DOODY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 17, 2002
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberts, Jr. v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv80700
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., SETERUS, INC.,, Experian Information Solutions, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David L ROBERTS, JR and David Lewis Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REYNOLDS v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01261
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, SETERUS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
