Cases 51 - 60 of 403
Moore v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv01881
Plaintiff:
David T. Moore
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Blake Lamb, Dwight Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Nicholas Moore
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS T. MOORE
RUSSELL v. MOORE
as 3:2022cv04844
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN RUSSELL
Defendant:
T MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calvin James v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 22-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin B. James
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Attorney General, William T. Moore, Judge, Chris L. Ray and others
Moore v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00368
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Moore, III
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURRAY v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2021cv03545
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE MURRAY, JR
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, C COOPER, GARY ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR HARPER
Defendant:
WILLIAM PATRICK ADAMS, REBECCA L GRIST, SHARELL FINCHER LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Judge William T. Moore, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Dist. Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathy Moore v. Columbia Sussex Management LLC
as 21-2045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY T. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA SUSSEX MANAGEMENT LLC, d/b/a Hilton Head Marriott Resorts & Spa, COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION and COLUMBIA PROPERTIES HILTON HEAD LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
