Cases 51 - 60 of 331
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89629
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76860
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65388
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Rob Britten, Richard Martin, Ryan LaFave and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harris County Sergeant et al
as 4:2019cv04798
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff, Walgreens Employees, Harris County Sergeant and others
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. National Interstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv12670
Defendant:
Willie Spencer, Samson Tours, Inc. and National Interstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis Artifacts, Inc. et al v. Repp
as 5:2019cv00354
Plaintiff:
Davis Artifacts, Inc. and Harry Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Steven Repp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. City of Dallas
as 3:2019cv01898
Defendant:
City of Dallas
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Davis v. County of Allegheny, et al
as 19-2703
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
