Cases 51 - 60 of 321
Salser v. Jackson-Minor
as 1:2022cv01993
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Salser
Defendant:
Jackson-Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinty v. Pappilion
as 4:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Timothy James McGinty, Jr
Defendant:
Brodrick Pappilion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Headrick v. Chambers et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Headrick
Defendant:
Sgt. Chambers, C/O Brown, C/O Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MDOF Wells, LLC v. Timothy James McCormack
as 8:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
MDOF Wells, LLC
Defendant:
Timothy James McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ritchie v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05242
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Ritchie
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woolfork et al v. Desantis et al
as 2:2021cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeremy Woolfork, Jeremey Woolfork, Joshua Andrew Finley and others
Respondent:
Ron Desantis, Amira D. Fox and Kathleen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGinty v. Officer Howell et al
as 4:2021cv03748
Plaintiff:
Timothy James McGinty, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Howell and Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Watkins
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
Thorne v. Norman et al
as 2:2021cv04190
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Thorne and Timothy J Thorne
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Tabatha (unknown), Sgt (unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
