Cases 51 - 60 of 6,426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Copes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Seth Thomas Copes
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bane et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01058
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bane, Francisco Acovera, Clay Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mahammed v. Mariner et al
as 1:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mahammed
Defendant:
Ofc. R. Mariner, Shift Supervisor Barbara Milbourne and Shift Commander Tracie Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry CopeIn re: Terry Cope
as 23-5597
Petitioner:
In re: TERRY WAYNE COPE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIERI v. AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv02410
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CIERI and KATHERINE CIERI
Defendant:
AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., AURORA PUMP COMPANY, BAYER CROPSCIENCE and others
Cross Defendant:
CARRIER CORPORATION, CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION, CLA-VAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cope v. Lillard
as 3:2023cv02133
Petitioner:
Randall E Cope
Respondent:
T Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: Randall Cope
as 23-5566
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL E. COPE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COPE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00893
Petitioner:
GAIL COPE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
