Cases 51 - 60 of 1,355
Strege v. Vos, et al
as 22-1527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM PAUL STREGE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC A. VOS, Chief Public Defender in his official and individual capacity, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, LTD, MARTI LICON-VITALE, Warden of MDC Guaynabo, in his official and individual capacity and others
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Alex Gorsky, et al
as 22-35590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX GORSKY, CEO of Johnson & Johnson, JOHN G. STUMPF, CEO Wells Fargo & Company and LARRY PAGE, CEO Google, Inc.
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 3:2022cv03102
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
John Demos, Jr. v. Alex Gorsky, et al
as 22-35515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX GORSKY, CEO, Johnson & Johnson, JOHN STUMPF, CEO, Wells Fargo and LARRY PAGE, CEO, Google Inc.
Togail Technologies Ltd. v. Google Inc.
as 6:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Togail Technologies Ltd.
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 2:2022mc50916
Plaintiff:
David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant:
Google Inc.
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Said v. Wray et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
Mody Said
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Pichai Sundararajan, Dan Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Google Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Google Inc and Youtube LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
