Cases 61 - 70 of 1,911
Moretto v. Warden Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv14315
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Moretto
Defendant:
Warden Rogers, Warden Cox, R Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY v. RANKIN et al
as 2:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY
Defendant:
OWEN RANKIN and ARDILLIA C. RANKIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Funk v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Derek Funk
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALDONADO v. RANKIN
as 5:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
DEPUTY SHERRIFF RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MSTREO, LLC v. Swims et al
as 3:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
MSTREO, LLC
Defendant:
Talechia Swims, United States of America, Larry Swales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Rankin (Sullivan)
as 23-7887
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES SULLIVAN
United States of America v. Rankin
as 23-7882
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SULLIVAN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DREW RANKIN
United States of America v. Rankin (Bilda)
as 23-7875
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JAMES SULLIVAN, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BILDA
Laura A. Rankins v. SSanofi Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09548
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
