Cases 61 - 70 of 4,498
Gomez Cruz et al v. Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynaldo Perez, Jose Esposorio Gomez Cruz, Junior and others
Defendant:
Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC doing business as Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC and He Shun Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Luna v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02840
Plaintiff:
Rosario Luna
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Randy Luna v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC
as 24-1281
Plaintiff:
RANDY LUNA, individually and for others similarly situated
Defendant:
TUG HILL OPERATING, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Eyad Karzoun v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Eyad Karzoun
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Luna v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Luna
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Alonge v. Luna
as 24-1302
Petitioner:
OLU VICTOR ALONGE
Respondent:
RICHARD A. LUNA, FCI Berlin, Warden and RICHARD A. LUNA, Warden, FCI Berlin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
