Cases 61 - 70 of 72
JONES et al v. TSA STORES, INC.
as 2:2010cv05005
Plaintiff:
ALAN JONES and MARY JANE JONES
Defendant:
TSA STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Bell Aerospace Services, Inc. v. U.S. Aero Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00141
Defendant:
Scott Alan Jones (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kuhl
as 3:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Bradley Alan Jones
Defendant:
Darrel Kuhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. England et al
as 5:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Alan Jones
Defendant:
Rick England, Dan Mugg, C Earnest Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jones v. Danzig
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Midland Credit Management, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv01845
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan Jones and Jason Alan Jones
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc, Midland Credit Management, Inc, Experian Information Solutions, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Jones v. LMSC Leasehold, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02191
Plaintiff:
Alan Jones, Alan Jones and Alan Jones
Defendant:
LMSC Leasehold, LLC, Rainbow Health & Rehab of Memphis, LLC and Sanford Mann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Bielke et al
as 3:2007cv00594
Petitioner:
Bradley Alan Jones
Defendant:
Judy Bielke, Melanie Mclaughlin, Guard Bescup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bohannon et al
as 5:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
Roger Alan Jones
Defendant:
B Bohannon, NFN Jenkins, NFN McBroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
