Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Yeison Ortiz v. Chad Wolf
as 20-7028
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, Baltimore Field Office Director, JACK KAVANAGH, Director of Howard County Detention Center and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
YEISON LEON ORTIZ
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5202
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ala'a Jibril, individually, Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J. and others
Minaya-Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-2178
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elvin M. Minaya-Rodriguez
Bharatkumar Thakker, et al v. Warden York County Prison, et al
as 20-2316
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BHARATKUMAR G. THAKKER, HENRY PRATT and JEAN HERDY CHRISTY AUGUSTIN
Defendant / Appellant:
ACTING DIRECTOR UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ACTING SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Sanchez Ramirez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2020cv22545
Defendant:
KENNETH CUCCINELLI II, male, Chad F. Wolf, Linda M. Swacina and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
