Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Montin v. Moore et al
as 4:2014cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Maxwell Montin
Defendant:
Y. Scott Moore, Mario Scalora, Mary Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
First National Bank of Omaha v. Barnhill
as 8:2014mc00054
Defendant:
Ann Marie Barnhill
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Mendenhall
as 7:2014cv05006
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Mendenhall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker v. Retelsdorf et al
as 4:2014cv03103
Plaintiff:
Reginald G. Baker
Defendant:
Brenda Leuck, Ryan Lindberg, Leigh Ann Retelsdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Astrue
as 7:2014cv05007
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Mendenhall
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ponec et al v. Guy Strevey & Associates, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00114
Defendant:
Guy Strevey & Associates, Inc., Hornor Townsend & Kent and Guy Strevey
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Ponec and James F. Ponec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Baker v. Neneman et al
as 4:2014cv03051
Defendant:
The City of Omaha, Nebraska, Bruce Holcomb and Lou Ann Neneman
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nielsen v. Halfwassen et al
as 7:2013cv05010
Defendant:
Caryl Anne Halfwassen and Colin J. Halfwassen
Plaintiff:
John D. Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
