Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Lawrence Hash v. Charles Lee, et al
as 14-16727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES DUDLEY LEE, Health Care Manager, SVSP, J. G. ARCEO, C. BLACKSTONE and others
Joshua David Mellberg LLC et al v. Will et al
as 4:2014cv02025
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Mellberg LLC and Joshua David Mellberg
Defendant:
Jovan Will , Tree Fine , Impact Partnership LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juan Arceo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70575
Petitioner:
JUAN ROCHA ARCEO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ramon Arceo v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Ramon Arceo
Defendant:
J. Gonzales, M. Receo and E. Souvannkaham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N.S.A. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv08812
Plaintiff:
J. G. A., N. S. A., Alfredo Arceo and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Deputy J. Gildo and others
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arceo et al
as 1:2013cv08491
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Inocencio Arceo and EL Taconazo Norteno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABARCA et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2013at00753
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ABARCA , CRISTINA ABARCA, DENISE ABARCA and others
Petitioner:
LISA EDDINGS-ROSS, CHRISTIE HAMILTON, BRANDON HENSON and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company and Amsted Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
N.K.A. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv05507
Plaintiff:
C. A. A., N. K. A. and Estate of Rigoberto Arceo
Defendant:
Sheriff Leroy Baca, County of Los Angeles and Does
Fletcher et al v. Quinn et al
as 3:2013cv03191
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher, Chad Hardy, Richard Bilik and others
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Lisa Madigan and IL General Assembly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arceo v. Payne et al
as 1:2013cv01440
Plaintiff:
Enrique Flores Arceo
Defendant:
Rhonda G. Payne, Matthew Krull, Hazel Burton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
