Cases 61 - 70 of 1,641
Charles HolbrookIn re: Charles Holbrook
as 23-2107
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES JUDSON HOLBROOK
Respondent:
FREDEANE ARTIS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Riley v. Lumpkin
as 23-11134
Petitioner / Appellant:
Artie Joseph Riley, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bell v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv12720
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A. Bell
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Matt McCauley, Rander Rewers and others
CARROLL v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv04376
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, ET AL., UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT, LUKE MCCANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miranda Jr v. Palm Beach Sheriff Office et al
as 9:2023cv81449
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Miranda Jr
Defendant:
Palm Beach Sheriff Office, Artis Hardwick, Jacob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CARROLL v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv04030
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
CHERYL STEBERGER, HEATHER ADAMS, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nicholas Scott v. Fredeane Artis
as 23-2011
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS E. SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FREDEANE ARTIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
