Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Chad Johnson, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 15-30179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD JOHNSON and BETTY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Christian v. Johnson et al
as 8:2014cv03994
Petitioner:
William Christian
Respondent:
Betty Johnson and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv04939
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation , Stryker Orthopaedics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maggy Garabedian et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03995
Plaintiff:
Maggy Garabedian , Lavonne Adams , Cynthia Turk and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Stryker Corporation et al
as CAE/2:14-cv-02230
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation , Stryker Orthopaedics and others
Johnson v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02230
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation , Stryker Orthopaedics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pringle v. Johnson et al
as 8:2014cv03041
Petitioner:
Joseph Jermaine Pringle
Defendant:
Betty Johnson and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bishop v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bishop, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Johnson, Simmons, C. Session and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maggy Garabedian et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-04391
Plaintiff:
Maggy Garabedian , Lavonne Adams , Cynthia Turk and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Maggy Garabedian et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04391
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Adams, Flora Agee, Patricia Alexander and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
