Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Hall v. Pocatello Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kent Emmett Hall
Defendant:
Pocatello Police Department, Officer Westfall, Officer Brian Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Teleperformance USA Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Keesya D Ross
Defendant:
Teleperformance USA Inc, Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bank of America, N A v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N A
Defendant:
Brian Harris, Leigh Anne Harris, Illinois Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Harris v. Zimmer,Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03352
Plaintiff:
Doreen Harris and Brian Harris
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ZIMMER INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01975
Plaintiff:
DOREEN HARRIS and BRIAN HARRIS
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ZIMMER INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01975
Plaintiff:
DOREEN HARRIS and BRIAN HARRIS
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Dewayne Blount v. Brian Harri
as 12-6293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE BLOUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HARRIS and ERIC JOHNSON
HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv09078
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, NA
Defendant:
Brian Harris and Nicor Gas Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Affliction Holdings, LLC v. Brian Harris
as 8:2011cv01882
Plaintiff:
Affliction Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
DOE 1 through DOE 10, inclusive and Brian Harris
Harris v. Franklin
as 5:2011cv00947
Petitioner:
Brian Harris
Respondent:
Eric Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
