Cases 61 - 70 of 82
US v. Brian Rich
as 14-4774
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN MATTHEW RICH
United States of America v. Jackson
as 2:2014cv01584
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brian Matthew Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gholizadeh-Sadeghmoghaddam v. Laird, et al
as 2:2014cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marzieh Gholizadeh-Sadeghmoghaddam
Defendant:
Brian Matthew Laird and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Brian Matthew McColley v. Warden Tews
as 2:2014cv03696
Petitioner:
Brian Matthew McColley
Respondent:
Warden Tews
Brian Matthew McColley v. Ms. B. Woiverton et al
as 2:2014cv03697
Defendant:
Billingsly, Ruffo, Tews and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Matthew McColley
Burlingame et al v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Brian Matthew Burlingame, Travis Gray, JOIN and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hall et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 3:2013cv04512
Plaintiff:
Joe Hall and Dolores Hall
Defendant:
Brian Matthews and State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ken Diviney v. Austin Vantrease
as 13-1891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEN DIVINEY, Parent and Next Friend of Ryan Kenneth Diviney
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MATTHEW MCLHINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
AUSTIN VANTREASE and JONATHAN MAY
Defendant:
COLIN MCKEFFERY, BRANDON GROUX, TYLER HUSFELT and others
Saude v. Merced County Superior Court
as 1:2013cv00948
Petitioner:
Brian Matthew Saude
Respondent:
Merced County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEWARD v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MATTHEW STEWARD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
