Cases 61 - 70 of 702
Ramirez-Bueno v. Looney et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Ramirez-Bueno
Defendant:
C. Looney, Johnson, Dinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv04806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PB GROCERY, A PENNSYLVANIA SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
PB GROCERY and PORFIRIO ANTONIO BUENO ALMONTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Butler v. Tonche
as 23-10483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant / Appellee:
Valerie Tonche, Prison Guard, Jennifer Rojas, Prison Licensed Vocational Nurse, Evangelina Bueno, Prison Guard and others
Bueno v. Baker et al
as 1:2023cv03011
Petitioner:
Jesus Bueno
Respondent:
Tyrone Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUENO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16167
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE BUENO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Labor Trial Court No. 33 in Buenos Aires, Argentina in Maria Amelia Frateschi v. Chevron Argentina S.R.L.
as 3:2023mc80138
In Re:
REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE LABOR TRIAL COURT NO. 33 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN MARIA AMELIA FRATESCHI V. CHEVRON ARGENTINA S.R.L.
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Bueno v. BP Expl & Prod
as 23-30209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Enrique Bueno
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
BUENO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10032
Plaintiff:
CAMILLE BUENO
Defendant:
3M and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
