Cases 61 - 70 of 177
DeSilva v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Karl Krycia, City of Austin and Christopher Taylor
Plaintiff:
Athige Denzil DeSilva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11058
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Chaffee Court et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Sam Weihman, Ramsey and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Weiser et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Jason R. Dunn, Sam Weihman and Philip Weiser
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dunn et al
as 1:2020cv03811
Defendant:
Jason R. Dunn, Lewis T. Babcock, Denvers Federal Prosecutors and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jergens, Inc. v. 5th Axis, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02377
Defendant:
5th Axis, Inc., Adam Lane, Stephen Grangetto and others
Plaintiff:
Jergens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Ramos v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv01256
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ramos
Defendant:
City of Austin and Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Quincey Sanders, Paul Alvin Womack, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Gregory L. Reaser and others
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Steven T. Marshall, Louis V. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
