Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Roy v. Ware et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Plaintiff: Kevin D Roy
Defendant: Glen Ware, Louis, James Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Bourdon, et al v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 12-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jonathan Thomas Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls
Defendant - Appellee: Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Honorable, Secretary of the Navy, O Tom Crane, HR Specialist for NDW, Harris Cummings, Cheif Investigator for NDW and others
Curtis Jackson, Jr. v. City of Houston, et al
as 12-20003
Plaintiff - Appellant: CURTIS EARL JACKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF HOUSTON, Office of the Mayor, Annise D. Parker and City Council Members all in Official Capacities, C. A. MCCLELLAND, Chief, HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS and others
Jonathan Bourdon, et al v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 11-5302
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jonathan Thomas Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls
Defendant - Appellee: Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Honorable, Secretary of the Navy, O Tom Crane, HR Specialist for NDW, Harris Cummings, Chief Investigator for NDW and others
Professional Firefighters Asso, et al v. James C. Zalewski We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3253
Plaintiff - Appellee: Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha, Local 385, Omaha Police Officers Association, Local 101, Omaha Civilian Employees Association, Local 251 and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: Rick Bergholz, Mark Allen Lloyd, Stephen Bosilevac and others
Defendant - Appellee: City of Omaha, a Municipal Corporation, Jim Suttle, Omaha Mayor, each in their official capacity, Ben Gray, Omaha City Council Member, each in their official capacity and others
Interested Party - Appellant: James C. Zalewski
Jim Dintelman, et al v. Chicot Cty. Memorial Hospital, et al
as 11-2727
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jim Dintelman, In His Own Right, doing business as Elite Medical Services, Inc., David Donovan, In His Own Right, doing business as EMS of Southeast Arkansas, Inc., Elite Medical Services, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Chicot County Memorial Hospital Board, Governing, Invdividually and in Offical Capacities, QHR, a Plano Texas Corporation, Fred Zieman, Individually and in His Official Capacity as County Judge of Chicot County Arkansas and others
The Anderson Group, LLC v. City of Saratoga Spring
as 11-3094
Plaintiff - Appellee: The Anderson Group, LLC and Gail Anderson
Defendant - Appellant: City of Saratoga Springs, Michael Lenz, individually and in his official capacities as Mayor of Saratoga Springs and Saratoga Springs City Council member, Saratoga Springs City Council and others
White v. Stamps, Arkansas, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv04058
Plaintiff: Victor White, Jr
Defendant: Stamps, Arkansas, City of, Mayor of Stamps, Arkansas and City Council Members of Stamps, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davin Corona et al v. City of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv03762
Plaintiff: D. R. A., Noemi Armendariz, Martha Barrios and others
Defendant: All Involed Los Angeles City Council Members, All Involved City of Los Angeles Employees, All Involved General Services - Public Safety Officers and others
Professional Firefighters Asso, et al v. James C. Zalewski We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1817
Plaintiff - Appellee: Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha, Local 385, Omaha Police Officers Association, Local 101, Omaha Civilian Employees Association, Local 251 and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: Rick Bergholz, Mark Allen Lloyd, Stephen Bosilevac and others
Defendant - Appellee: City of Omaha, A Municipal Corporation, Jim Suttle, Omaha Mayor, each in their official capacity, Ben Gray, Omaha City Council Member, each in their official capacity and others
Interested Party - Appellant: James Conrad Zalewski

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?