Cases 61 - 70 of 96
JEDA Capital-Lenox, LLC v. Commissioner of the Internal R
as 11-4539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEDA Capital-Lenox, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and American Group I Civil Engineering, P.C.
McNeil v. CIR
as 11-9017
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY P. MCNEIL
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
In re: McNeil
as 11-9011
Petitioner:
JERRY P. MCNEIL
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Larkin et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 9:2011cv80732
Plaintiff:
Maryann Larkin and Thomas Larkin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
McDermott v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
William McDermott
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Secretary of the Treasury and Raymond L Erickson
Tito Mazzetta & Associates, P.C. v. Reja et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Defendant:
Roma Reja and Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Ching Tse Yu et al v. Thomas M Jankowski et al
as 2:2010cv05777
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Daniel Yu, Charles Dee Yu and Ching Tse Yu
Janet Marcusse v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Janet Marcusse
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Larry Bradshaw v. Commissioner of the IRS
as 10-12671
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY R. BRADSHAW
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
:
SERVICE
Bartlett v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Betsy Bartlett
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
