Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 121
NEW FLORIDA MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND et al v DETZNER
as 4:2018cv00466
Plaintiff: COMMON CAUSE, New Florida Majority Education Fund and MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND
Defendant: KEN DETZNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
The Washington Post et al v. McManus et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02527
Plaintiff: The Baltimore Sun Company, LLC, Maryland-Delaware-D.C. Press Association, Inc., Schurz Communications, Inc. and others
Defendant: Malcolm L. Funn, Board Member Kelley A. Howells, State Administrator Linda H. Lamone and others
Amicus Curiae: Campaign Legal Center and Common Cause Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judicial Watch, Inc., et al v. California Common Cause, et al
as 18-56105
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT, WOLFGANG KUPKA and others
Defendant: DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as the Registrar-Recorded/County Clerk of Los Angeles County, California and ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as the California Secretary of State
Movant - Appellant: CALIFORNIA COMMON CAUSE, Proposed Defendant-Intervenor
Common Cause Indiana, et al v. Marion County Election Board, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2735
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMMON CAUSE INDIANA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, by its Greater Indianapolis Branch 3053 and on behalf of its individual members, DORIS A. MCDOUGAL and others
Defendant: MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, KEITH JOHNSON, in his official capacity as a member of the Marion County Election Board, MYRA ELDRIDGE, in her official capacity as a member of the Marion County Election Board and others
Intervenor - Appellant: STATE OF INDIANA
Common Cause Indiana v. Connie Lawson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2491
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Defendant - Appellant: CONNIE LAWSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Indiana, J. BRADLEY KING, in his official capacity as Co-Director of the Indiana Election Division and ANGELA NUSSMEYER, in her official capacity as Co-Director of the Indiana Election Division
Corman et al v. Torres et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00443
Plaintiff: Jacob Corman , Michael Folmer , Lou Barletta and others
Defendant: Robert Torres and Jonathan M. Marks
Amicu: Brian McCann , National Democratic Redistricting Committee , League of Women Voters of Pennyslvania and others
Intervenor_defendant: Carmen Febo San Miguel , James Solomon , John Greiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA v. LAWSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03936
Plaintiff: COMMON CAUSE INDIANA
Defendant: J. BRADLEY KING, CONNIE LAWSON and ANGELA NUSSMEYER
Intervenor Defendant: Public Interest Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 gg-2 Nat'l. Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA)
Common Cause/New York v. Brehm et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06770
Plaintiff: Common Cause/New York,
Defendant: Robert A. Brehm, Todd D. Valentine, Peter S. Kosinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
COMMON CAUSE v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
as 1:2017cv01398
Plaintiff: COMMON CAUSE
Defendant: PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Free Press, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1129
Petitioner: Free Press, Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., Prometheus Radio Project and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent: ION Media Networks, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?