Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Morrison v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2015cv01419
Plaintiff:
James F. Morrison
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ohio State Highway Patrol, Richland County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05260
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Hunt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Hunt v. Dan Madigan, et al
as 15-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN MADIGAN, OFFICER WILLMORE, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY SHERIFF, CHAMPAIGN ILLINOIS, 61801 and others
Hunt v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv00910
Plaintiff:
Beverly D. Hunt
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyons v. Kinsel et al
as 2:2015cv10160
Plaintiff:
Levert Lyons
Defendant:
Scott C Kinsel, Jeffrey D Hunt, Ethan L Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHUNG v. HUNT et al
as 2:2014cv06076
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHUNG
Defendant:
ELOID D. HUNT and PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. CULP
as 1:2014cv03943
Plaintiff:
LANCE D. HUNT
Defendant:
DANIEL CLAYTON CULP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv13946
Plaintiff:
Tonya D. Hunt
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkansas Teacher Retirement Sy, et al v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 14-15315
In Re:
In re: NETFLIX, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM and STATE-BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., REED HASTINGS,, DAVID B. WELLS and others
AgJunction LLC v. Agrian Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02069
Defendant:
Agrian Inc. , Jeffrey A. Dearborn , Aaron D. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
AgJunction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
